Legal Opinion
Panavision International, L.P. v. Toeppen
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 5, 1996No. CV 96-3284 DDP (JRx)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Panavision’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Dennis Toeppen for federal and state trademark dilution, federal trademark infringement, and federal unfair competition came before the Court on October 7, 1996. Toeppen’s cross motion for summary judgment came before the Court on October 21, 1996. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court grants in part and denies in part both motions.
I. BACKGROUND
The issue presented by this litigation is whether the defendant violated federal or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Felsher v. University of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Intermatic Inc. v. ToeppenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Jews for Jesus v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.