Legal Opinion
Jews for Jesus v. Brodsky
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 6, 1998No. CIV. A. 98-274(AJL)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This action involves, in the words of the defendant, a “bogus” Internet site and, again, in the words of the defendant, his use of “deceit and trickery.” As a result, there is a dispute 1 between the plaintiff, Jews for Je sus (the “Plaintiff’ or the “Plaintiff Organization”), and the defendant, Steven Brodsky (the “Defendant”), in connection with the use by the Defendant of the Internet 2 domain names 3 “jewsforjesus,org” and “jews-for-jesus.com”. 4
On 23 January 1998, the Plaintiff filed a complaint (the “Complaint”). The Plaintiff contends the deliberate…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Lamparello v. FalwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.