Legal Opinion

Intermatic Inc. v. Toeppen

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 26, 1996No. 96 C 1982PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The court has carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Denlow’s report and recommendation (“R&R”), the objections of defendant Toeppen, and the responses of plaintiff Inter-matic Inc. Toeppen’s main objection is that the R&R failed to consider whether a domain name has the inherent attribute of a trademark. Defendant’s objection rests on the underlying fact that the internet is a new medium of communication. Although it is a new medium, courts must still apply traditional trademark law, while also considering the policy implications. Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Avery Dennison Corp. v. SumptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API