Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Bolliger, Hampton & Tarlow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. C 88 0560CV; CA A67501PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in an action for recovery of unpaid wages, penalties and amounts due under a shareholder’s contract. Defendant cross-appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part on the appeal, and affirm on the cross-appeal.

Plaintiff, an attorney, joined defendant law firm on July 1, 1987, as one of four 25-percent shareholders of a professional corporation. In the “Agreement Re Corporation” (Agreement), plaintiff promised to contribute to the corporation tangible assets having a net fair market value of $2,160 and the accounts receivable (and their proceeds) from his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lamy v. Jack Jarvis & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boehm & Co. v. Environmental Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Quality Contractors, Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. A-C Construction, Inc. v. Bakke Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Marion County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Bomareto Ent., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API