Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. First National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1980No. 79-887PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The primary issue raised in this cause concerns an interpretation of the Ohio Uniform Commercial Code as it applies to the facts of this case. This interpretation revolves around a reading of R. C. 1304.24(A), which provides: “As against its customer, a bank may charge against his account any item which is otherwise properly payable from that account even though the charge creates an overdraft.” All the parties agree, as did the Court of Appeals, that the three checks were not “properly payable” since they were not endorsed by one of the named payees, Allied. This conclusion is mandated by R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. University National Bank v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Feldman Construction Co. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Pacific Metals Co. v. TRACY-COLLINS BANK & TRUSTUtah Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wozniak v. WozniakOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Cox v. Fisher Fazio Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Glimcher v. ReinhornOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API