Legal Opinion

Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1986No. 86-205PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The central problem presented by this action is which of two innocent parties should bear the loss of this embezzlement-check forger scheme — the thief’s employer or the employer’s bank. To facilitate consideration of this devilishly complex appeal, we will first outline the various legal arguments presented. The second part of our opinion will then apply the controlling state law to the curious facts at hand.

*224I

In its appeal to this court, appellant National City challenges the appellate ruling in two broad propositions of law. In the first, appellant argues that the court of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Salzl v. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Border City Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MoanOhio Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Claris, Ltd. v. Hotel Dev. Servs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Hinkle v. Cornwell Quality Tool Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. G.F.D. Enterprises, Inc. v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API