Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bannwarth

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 2, 1993No. 67,476; ACM 29040PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, consistent with his pleas, of wrongfully using Tylenol III, a Schedule III controlled substance; wrongfully using Valium, a Schedule IV controlled substance; wrongfully possessing Tylenol III; stealing Tylenol III and Valium (one specification each); and dereliction of duty by failing to properly account for Tylenol III and Valium tablets entrusted to him in his capacity as the noncommissioned officer in charge of the base pharmacy, in violation of Articles 112a, 121, and 92, Uniform…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BlockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. McLarenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. SchlamerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API