Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Eagle Box & Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1902No. S.F. No. 2059PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought by an employee of defendant for personal injuries received in defendant’s box-factory while plaintiff was operating a rip-saw. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the court, on motion of defendant, nonsuited plaintiff for want of evidence to establish a case for the jury; and this appeal is from the judgment following the nonsuit and from an order denying plaintiff a new trial.

The contention of appellant is, that the court erred in deciding that, as a matter of law, there was no evidence to sustain plaintiff’s case and in taking the case away from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ingerman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Verdelli v. Gray's Harbor Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ryan v. Los Angeles Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Holloway v. Pasadena & Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Wells v. Lloyd IVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Forquer v. Slater Brick Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Jenson v. Will & Finck Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Petersen v. California Cotton Mills Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API