Ingerman v. Moore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
— This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff, and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that at the date of receiving the injury, and for some time prior thereto, plaintiff was employed by defendants in their saw-mill; that his regular work was to assist the man in charge of a “ scantling-machine and saw” for cutting lumber, plaintiff’s duty being “to put the lumber in place to be run through the machine and cut by the saw.” On or about February 14, 1884, the man regularly employed to run…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Dowling v. Gerard B. Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Jones v. Florence Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Dowling v. Gerard B. Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
3Cited by30 opinions
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Pigeon v. W. P. Fuller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Verdelli v. Gray's Harbor Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Elliff v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.