Legal Opinion

Popovich v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Tax Court

Decided April 24, 2014No. 49T10-1010-TA-53PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL AND RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

WENTWORTH, J.

This matter involves Nick Popovich’s first Motion to Compel the Indiana Department of State Revenue to respond to fifty-three (53) of his discovery requests and the Department’s Motion for Protective Order that seeks to protect from disclosure the information and documents requested by Popovich.1 The Court grants the parties’ motions in part and denies them in part.2

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2007, the Department audited Popovich for the 2002 through 2004 tax years. (See Resp’t App. Vol.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Vernon v. Kroger Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Keystone Square Shopping Center Co. v. Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nick Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2014
  2. Brandenburg Industrial Service Co., an Illinois Corp. v. Ind. Dept. of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2015
  3. Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2016
  4. Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2016
  5. The University of Phoenix, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API