Legal Opinion
Popovich v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
Indiana Tax Court
Decided March 7, 2016No. 49T10-1010-TA-53PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S REQUEST FOR EXPENSES PURSUANT TO INDIANA TRIAL RULE 37(A)(4)
WENTWORTH, J.
The Indiana Department of State Revenue argues that it is entitled to expenses in the amount of $5,175.25 for successfully defending against Nick Popovich’s second motion to compel. See generally Popovich v. Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue (Popovich II), 7 N.E.3d 419 (Ind.Tax Ct.2014), reh’g denied. The Court agrees.
BACKGROUND 1
In December of 2011, Popovich subpoenaed the Department’s designated Trial Rule 30(B)(6) witness, directing him to bring several pages of original documentation to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penn Central Corp. v. BuchananIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Georgetown Steel Corp. v. ChaffeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2014
- Hill v. FitzpatrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Walker v. McCreaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The University of Phoenix, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2017