Legal Opinion

Popovich v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Tax Court

Decided March 7, 2016No. 49T10-1010-TA-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR EXPENSES PURSUANT TO INDIANA TRIAL RULE 37(A)(4)

WENTWORTH, J.

Nick Popovich has requested expenses in the amount of $51,210.29 for successfully prosecuting his first motion to, compel. See generally Popovich v. Indiana Dep’t of State Revenue (Popovich I), 7 N.E.3d 406 (Ind.Tax Ct.2014). The Court finds that Popovich is entitled to be reimbursed for reasonable expenses and awards him $24,963.00.

BACKGROUND 1

On February 2Q, 2012, just 10 days before the hearing on Popovich’s first motion to compel, the Court ordered the Department to provide “a discrete and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Noble County v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hatfield v. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Munsell v. HambrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Brown v. KatzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. KuespertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sahara Mart, Incorporated v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2018
  2. The University of Phoenix, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API