Legal Opinion

Benema v. Union Central Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1933No. 7,027PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by the Union Central Life Insurance Company from a judgment rendered against it and in favor of plaintiff. The action is one for wages earned by plaintiff as a carpenter under an alleged contract made by him with defendants. Defendant Robison defaulted. The Union Central Life Insurance Company, which will hereafter be called defendant, denied that it was a party to the contract.

The jury found for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial and noticed it for hearing in due time on December 7, 1931. Before the time noticed for the hearing, plaintiff’s counsel filed an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hoppin v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Dunn v. BeckMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Union Central Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schulz v. PeakeMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Spenard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ArbogastWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Curtis v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API