Legal Opinion

Spenard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Wright

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1962No. 109PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This is an action brought by a contractor to recover money deposited by him, in lieu of a bid bond, with his offer to construct a building for the offeree. He claims that the offer required written notice to him of its acceptance and, since such notice was never given, he is entitled to the return of his deposit. From a judgment in favor of the contractor the offeree appeals.

It appears from the record that in the fall of 1952 the appellant corporation, Spenard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Spenard), through its agent and architect, Edwin Crittenden,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hostetter v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dickerson v. GeiermannAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Graham v. RockmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Armco Steel Corp. v. Isaacson Structural Steel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API