Legal Opinion

California Canning Peach Growers v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1928No. Docket No. 3442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCK (G. F.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff is a nonprofit cooperative marketing association, organized in 1921 under the laws of the state of California. From the beginning the defendant John Harris was a member of the association and, with his fellow-members, had signed a marketing agreement with the association whereby he sold to the association, to be marketed for the benefit of himself, all of the peaches to be grown by him on a twenty-acre orchard for the next fourteen years.

During the years 1922 and 1923 defendant’s yearly crop was delivered and marketed under the terms of the marketing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caspary v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Benema v. Union Central Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Thornton v. Victor Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Olson v. Biola Cooperative Raisin Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. ListleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API