Newman Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
In these eighteen protests, consolidated for purposes of trial, plaintiffs seek to recover a portion of the duties paid upon *635certain merchandise invoiced as 2-man or 4-man rubber boats, without motor, with 2 metal valves and 2 motor mount ropes. The merchandise, consisting of inflatable rubber boats with compartmentation and construction to withstand motor boat speed, was classified as “Manufactures of india rubber * * * not specially provided for” under paragraph 1537 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, T.D. 53865, and assessed with duty at 12% per centum ad valorem.
Plaintif…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dwight v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roser Customs Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970