Legal Opinion

Buck Ex Rel. Faulkner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1965No. 112PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Uninsured motorists coverage “is designed to further close the gaps inherent in motor vehicle financial responsibility and compulsory insurance legislation.” 7 Am. Jur. 2d, Automobile Insurance § 135, p. 460. It “is intended, within fixed limits, to provide financial recompense to innocent persons who receive injuries, and the dependents of those who are killed, through the wrongful conduct of motorists who, because they are uninsured and not financially responsible, cannot be made to respond in damages.” Annotation: 79 A.L.R. 2d 1252, 1252-53.

G.S. 20-279.21 (b) (3), in pertinent part,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardin v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. In Re the Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API