Legal Opinion

In Re the Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLP

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 2009No. 424PA08PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to summons enforcement proceedings under N.C.G.S. § 105-258(a). We hold that the Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to such proceedings, and we therefore modify, affirm in part, and remand the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I. Background

Beginning in 1995 Ernst & Young, LLP (“Ernst & Young”), a global professional-services firm, sold to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) a number of tax shelters designed to reduce Wal-Mart’s income tax liability to various states, including North…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Ray v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Azure Dolphin, LLC v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Quality Built Homes Inc. v. Town of CarthageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. BDM Invs. v. Lenhil, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API