Legal Opinion

Doe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 5, 2016No. Case No. CV 15-04089-AB (FFMx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Before the Court are cross-motions seeking to adjudicate the standard of review that will apply to this ERISA case. (Dkt. Nos. 48, 49.) The Court heard oral argument on October 8, 2016 and took the matter under submission. The Court rules as follows.

I. BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are undisputed. Plaintiff, a resident of California, was an employee of William Morris Endeavor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kamerer v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Hutten v. Reliastar Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Kamerer v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API