Kamerer v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment in this action brought under the terms of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion (Docket No. 97) is granted and Defendants' motion (Docket No. 94) is denied. Plaintiff's long-term disability benefits are hereby reinstated and she is to be compensated for past benefits due.
Background
1. Plaintiff's Policies
The Plaintiff, Judith Kamerer, initiated this action seeking judicial review of Unum Life Insurance Company of America…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Patty Carradine v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Richard Kalish v. Liberty Mutual/liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berg v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Field v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Jane Doe v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Moseley v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- O'Connell v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.