Legal Opinion

In Re Tax Exemption Application of Kaul

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1997No. 74,528PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The Jackson County Appraiser and the Board of Jackson County Commissioners appeal the Jackson County District Court’s affirmance of a Board of Tax Appeals’ (BOTA) determination that land within the formal boundaries of the Potawatomi Indian reservation and owned in fee patent by Nina Kaul, an enrolled member of the Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe, is exempt from imposition of ad valorem property taxes pursuant to § 1 of the 1861 Act for Admission of Kansas into the Union.

Background

Prior to our analysis of the 1861 Act for the Admission of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. In Re Kaul for Relief From a Tax GrievanceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. In Re the Appeal of Director of Property ValuationSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Kaul v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUESupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API