In Re Kaul for Relief From a Tax Grievance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
In In re Tax Exemption Application of Kaul, 261 Kan. 755, 933 P.2d 717 (1997), hereafter referred to as Kaul I, this court considered § 1 of the 1861 Act for Admission of Kansas into the Union and the United States Supreme Court case of County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, 502 U.S. 251, 116 L. Ed. 2d 687, 112 S. Ct. 683 (1992), and concluded that if the source of Nina Kaul’s fee patent was an act of Congress or an agreement or treaty excepting the land from ad valorem taxation, Kaul’s property is not amenable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cass County v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FleischerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
- State ex rel. Secretary of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. BohrerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Kansas Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Welty v. USD 259Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- State v. BenavidesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.