Legal Opinion

State v. Miears

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 15, 2000No. CF 97-415; CA A101604PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant is charged with unlawful possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), unlawful possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(f), theft in the third degree, ORS 164.043, and giving false information to a police officer, ORS 162.385. The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress all evidence found after the police officer stopped defendant. We affirm.

When we review the legality of searches and seizures, this court is bound by the trial court’s findings of historical facts if they are supported by the record. State v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API