Legal Opinion

State v. Guest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 23, 2006No. 036108FE; A127471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.914 (2005). Although he pleaded guilty, the plea was conditional; as permitted by ORS 135.335(3), he reserved his right to appeal from the judgment in order to obtain appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. This is that appeal. Because we conclude that the trial court declined to resolve a conflict in the evidence that, had it been resolved in defendant’s favor, would have required suppression of the disputed evidence, we remand for further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. MiearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. HallamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API