State v. Wiggins
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance (PCS), assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Defendant argues that reasonable suspicion did not support the investigating officer’s decision to pat him down and that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to believe that a lump in defendant’s pocket contained a weapon. Although we reject defendant’s challenge to the patdown, we agree that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to believe that the lump in defendant’s pocket contained a weapon. We therefore reverse and remand.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. BickfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ParizekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. McMilianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.