Hawes v. Carberry
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SALMON, Judge.
On March 5,1993, appellees, John L. Carberry and his wife, Barbara A. Carberry, filed suit against appellant, Daniel Hawes, and Roy A. Dickan in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The suit alleged that the defendants violated Maryland’s Wiretap and Electronic Surveillance Law, Md.Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol.), § 10-401 et seq., of the Cts. & Jud. Proc. Article (the “Act”), and requested compensatory and punitive damages, as well as “reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.”
The case was heard non-jury on March 8,1994. Mr. Hawes, an attorney licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. HicksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- United States v. Rajindar K. ManiktalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Heinz GolitschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perry v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Deibler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Frase v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.