State v. King, Ct 2006-0021 (5-30-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Richard King appeals from the March 6, 2006 Decision of the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas denying defendant-appellant's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 2} On November 10, 2004, the Muskingum County Grand Jury indicted appellant on one count of pandering obscenity involving a minor in violation of Ohio Revised Code 2907.321(A)(1), a felony of the second degree, and sixty-one counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor in violation of Ohio Revised Code Section 2907.321(A)(5), felonies of the third degree. At his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. King, Ct2008-0062 (1-29-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. ClaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. King, 2007-Ca-0004 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025