Legal Opinion

State v. King, 2007-Ca-0004 (9-28-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2007No. 2007-CA-0004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Richard King appeals from the January 9, 2007 Decision of the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas denying defendant-appellant's Motion for a New Trial. Plaintiff-appellee is the State of Ohio.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶ 2} Appellant was indicted on one count of pandering obscenity involving a minor, a felony of the second degree, in violation of Ohio Revised Code 2907.321(A)(1) and sixty-one counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, a felony of the third degree, in violation of Ohio Revised Code Section 2907.321(A)(5). Appellant pled not guilty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. King, Ct 2006-0021 (5-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. King, Ct2008-0062 (1-29-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API