State v. King, Ct2008-0062 (1-29-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Richard King, appeals from the entry of Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas denying his "Motion For Relief From Judgment." The State of Ohio is Plaintiff-Appellee.
{¶ 2} On November 10, 2004, Appellant was indicted on one count of pandering obscenity involving a minor, a felony of the second degree, in violation of R.C. 2907.321(A)(1) and sixty-one counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, felonies of the third degree, in violation of R.C. 2907.321(A)(5). Appellant pled not guilty to all counts contained in the indictment. On January 24, 2005, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025