Legal Opinion

In Re Bailey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2009No. 05-BG-842Published

1Opinion of the Court

KRAMER, Associate Judge:

This reciprocal discipline matter stems from respondent’s suspension from the practice of law by Virginia for three years, effective April 19, 2005, for violating Rule 8.1(a) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 We adopt the recommendation of our Board on Professional Responsibility of a reciprocal three-year suspension, with reinstatement conditioned on a showing of fitness to practice law. For the purposes of reinstatement, the suspension will be deemed to begin on the date respondent satisfactorily complies with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The instant case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Small v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re StarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In Re Ayres-FountainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In Re GallagherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API