Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 1997No. 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the United States’ motion to dismiss the First Round Petition of Capital Bank (“L-Claim”), which was filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963© (1994). For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss will be granted and the L-Claim will be dismissed.
Background
The facts surrounding BCCI’s collapse are well known in the financial and legal communities, but certain facts bear repeating to set the stage for resolving the instant motion to dismiss Capital Bank’s L-Claim. 1 In early 1991, the Bank of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- (PC) Armenta v. GipsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Gosztyla v. JenkinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- United States v. Approximately $44,888.35 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- United States v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.