Hamilton v. Mihills
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered January 26, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action on a promissory note made by defendant to the Orofino Portland Cement Company, a corporation, and transferred by indorsement to plaintiff. Defendant, by answer, admits the making of the note, denies that plaintiff was a bona fide holder, and sets up as affirmative defenses (1) that the note was procured through fraudulent representations made by the general manager of the corporation; (2) that it was given for bonds and stock of the corporation which were issued without authority, in that the stock of the corporation was never subscribed.
Prior to April 20, 1912, one Reid half an option…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Raser v. MoomawWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hamilton v. RamageWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Oates v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Dobbin v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.