Biel v. Tolsma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered May 11, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for fraud.
1Opinion of the Court
Holcomb, J. —
On February 23, 1915, appellants purchased from respondent a certain Pope-Hartford automobile. Appellants sued to recover damages in the sum of $1,100, representing the sum paid for the car, upon allegations of fraud and deceit by way of false representations regarding *105the condition, price paid, and value of the car. The allegations of fraud and misrepresentation being denied by respondent and the cause tried to a jury, a verdict was found for respondent.
As ground for reversal, appellants urge that the instructions upon the issue of fraud given by the court were erroneous. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Stewart v. LarkinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Griffith v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Eames v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Luna De La Peunte v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Sova v. First Nat. Bk. of FerndaleWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Horton v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Getty v. Jett Ross Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
- Sutton v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.