State v. Joseph
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant Church Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the district court’s determination that the expiration of the statute of limitations and the application of collateral estoppel preclude appellant from raising the defense of lack of coverage in a proceeding to garnish insurance benefits. Because the district court erroneously applied the statute of limitations and collateral estoppel, we reverse and remand. Appellant moves that portions of respondent Henry’s appendix be stricken; we grant the motion.
FACTS
On November 27, 1992, Barbara Mae Joseph was driving a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Weavewood, Inc. v. S & P Home Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012