Legal Opinion
Pom Wonderful LLC v. COCA COLA CO.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 5, 2010No. CV 08-06237 SJO (FMOx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY ADJUDICATION RE: DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF SAFE HARBOR AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS [Docket Nos. 149,150]
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant The Coca Cola Company’s (“Coca Cola” or “Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, filed December 28, 2009, and Plaintiff Pom Wonderful LLC’s (“Pom” or “Plaintiff’) Motion for Partial Summary Adjudication Re: Defendant’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Law Offices of Mathew Higbee v. Expungement Assistance ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Stansfield v. Minute Maid Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2015
- Lee v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021