Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stiehl v. Greene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentDenecke, J.

The respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not in proper form. The majority of the court has sustained the motion.

I dissent from the majority decision.

The appellant attempted to serve the notice of appeal on the respondent’s attorney at his office, but found the office locked and, apparently, no one present. Appellant then filed the notice of appeal and subsequently served respondent’s attorney at his residence at 7:00 p,m. The courthouse was closed by this time; so proof of service could not be affixed to the filed notice of appeal. All…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muckle v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cooke v. TraverOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pohrman v. KLAMATH COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Millard v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Curry v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API