Legal Opinion
State v. Cadora
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 15, 1971No. 717SC759PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s first contention is that the bill of indictment in case #71CR3610 is not sufficient to charge him with the felony of possession of burglary tools in violation of G.S. 14-55.
The pertinent parts of G.S. 14-55 read as follows:
“If any person . . . shall be found having in his possession, without lawful excuse, any picklock, key, bit, or other implement of housebreaking . . . such person shall be guilty of a felony and punished by fine or imprisonment in the State’s prison, or'both, in the discretion of the court.” (Emphasis added.)
In the bill of indictment it is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. CauthenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014