Legal Opinion

State v. Cadora

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 717SC759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant’s first contention is that the bill of indictment in case #71CR3610 is not sufficient to charge him with the felony of possession of burglary tools in violation of G.S. 14-55.

The pertinent parts of G.S. 14-55 read as follows:

“If any person . . . shall be found having in his possession, without lawful excuse, any picklock, key, bit, or other implement of housebreaking . . . such person shall be guilty of a felony and punished by fine or imprisonment in the State’s prison, or'both, in the discretion of the court.” (Emphasis added.)

In the bill of indictment it is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. CauthenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API