State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant first asserts the Court erred “in failing to explain to the defendant the charges of uttering a forged instrument and in failing to make sure that he understood all the elements of this charge.” This contention challenges the trial court’s adjudication that the defendant’s pleas of guilty were freely, understanding^, and voluntarily entered. The record reveals that the defendant signed the “transcript of plea” contained in the record and that the trial judge, after the defendant was sworn to tell the truth, made careful inquiry of the defendant regarding his pleas…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . CatheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- In Re ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- In Re SwinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- In re C.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.