State v. . Vick
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
There are no exceptions to the evidence. The defendant relies primarily upon an alleged error in the charge of the court below and the failure of the trial judge to properly define the offense charged and the elements thereof.
•While the statute under which the defendant stands indicted creates three separate offenses this defendant was indicted for the violation of only one, to wit: The possession of implements of housebreaking without lawful excuse. In the court below the defendant made no contention that the tools found in the possession of Denton and the other occupant of the car were not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Watson v. Sylva Tanning Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Commonwealth v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Commonwealth v. ConlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- State v. BoliskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. CraddockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . CadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.