Boise Cascade Corp. v. East Stroudsburg Savings Ass'n
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This appeal is from an order denying appellants’ petition to intervene in an action in assumpsit brought by Boise Cascade Corporation against East Stroudsburg Savings Association. Boise Cascade has filed a motion to quash the appeal as interlocutory. We grant the motion.
-1-
Often, in deciding to quash an appeal as interlocutory, we do not consider the merits of the case. If, for example, we find that an appeal is from an order dismissing exceptions, instead of from a judgment entered on the docket, we look no further. Penstan Supply, Inc. v. Hay, 283 Pa.Superior Ct. 558, 424 A.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Toll v. TollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- K.C. and V.C. v. L.A. Appeal of: D.M and L.N.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- M. London, Inc. v. Fedders Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re Estate of AlbrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Richards v. TrimburSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.