Legal Opinion

K.C. and V.C. v. L.A. Appeal of: D.M and L.N.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2015No. 65 MAP 2015PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we are asked to determine whether an order denying a petition to intervene in a custody action is appealable as a collateral order as of right pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 313. 1 For the reasons that follow, we hold that such an order is, in fact, a collateral order appealable under Rule 313, and, thus, we reverse the Superior Court’s order quashing the appeal and remand to that court for consideration of the issues raised therein.

This case arises out of an action for the custody of L.A. (“Child”). Child was born on December 9, 2011, to L.A.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Shearer, D., Aplts. v. Hafer, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. K.W. v. S.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. C.G. v. J.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. C.G. v. J.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. MageeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API