Legal Opinion

Quality Excelsior Coal Co. v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1944No. 4-7206PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

This appeal concerns some of the relative'rights and duties of the lessor and the lessee in a coal mining lease.

Appellee, as lessor, filed suit in the chancery court to enjoin the appellant, as lessee, from using the subterranean passages under lessor’s land for removing coal from adjacent lands, and also to recover damages at five cents per ton for all coal from adjacent lands so removed through the subterranean passages under lessor’s land. Appellant demurred to the chancery jurisdiction, and also pleaded laches and estoppel, and claimed that the right to use the subterranean passages was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Biwabik Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  4. Ewert v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hastings Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Harper v. HannibalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. International Paper Company v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. CateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API