Legal Opinion
State v. Cate
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 9, 1963No. 5-3030PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
This case arose as a taxpayer’s suit brought by appellant, Peevy, under Act No. 193 of 1945 (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 17-304 et seq. [Repl. 1956]); and challenging the sale of county property to appellee, Cate. Drawn into the suit was the applicability of Act No. 481 of 1949 (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 17-1501 et seq. [Repl. 1956]) regarding county hospital property. From a decree affording the taxpayer only partial relief, both sides have appealed: so the entire controversy is before us for trial de novo on the record.
For many years Crawford County had owned twenty acres,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farmers Investment Co. v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Sorrells v. Bailey Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Roberson Enterprises v. MILLER LAND & LUMBER, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Thompson Funeral Home, Inc. v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.