Legal Opinion

United States v. Barker Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 2, 1929No. 3131Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Twenty-five entries of silk fabrics were made by the appellees at the port of Los Angeles. These goods were classified by the collector, *7in each instance, under paragraph 1206 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 60 per centum ad v alorem. Said paragraph reads as follows:

Pab. 1206. Plushes, including such as are commercially known as hatter’s plush, velvets, chenilles, velvet or plush ribbons, and all other pile fabrics, cut or uncut, composed wholly or in chief value of silk, 60 per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested in each instance. Three protests are recited in the record, which, together…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API