McFarlane v. State

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Appellant, James Charles McFar-lane (MeFarlane), seeks review of his convietion for larceny, contending that the conviction must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence to sustain it. MecFar-lane contends that he was not appropriately charged, i.e., that the evidence may support a conviction for possession of stolen property, but not for the larceny itself. We disagree with his view of the evidence and affirm.

ISSUE

[12] The sole issue in this appeal is simply stated by both parties: Is the evidence sufficient to sustain McFarlane's conviction for larceny?

FACTS

[13]…