Leyo v. State

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Christopher Leyo appeals his convictions on two counts of delivering a controlled substance (methamphetamine) 1 and one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance (methamphetamine). 2 Leyo claims there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions and prosecutorial misconduct occurred during closing argument. Finding no error, we affirm Leyo’s convictions.

ISSUES

[¶2] Leyo submits the following issues for this Court’s review, with which the State generally agrees:

I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict appellant for delivery of a controlled…