Legal Opinion

Houser v. Frank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1960No. 41,718PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

The appellees named in the caption brought a suit in the district court to cancel an oil, gas and mineral lease. Appellants were named as defendants. After a trial before the district court, the court entered judgment canceling the lease, and allowed plaintiffs the statutory sum of $100 and $300 for attorney fees, all as provided in G. S. 1949, 55-201 and 55-202.

The lease involved in this suit was called a “community” lease, but the special provisions of the lease need not be noted in the entirety. The pertinent parts of the lease and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. McKee v. EatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Konitz v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. HattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Cranston v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In the Interest of J.A.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Mansfield Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. Budlaw Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. Watson v. Gibson Capital, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API