Houser v. Frank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jackson, J.:
The appellees named in the caption brought a suit in the district court to cancel an oil, gas and mineral lease. Appellants were named as defendants. After a trial before the district court, the court entered judgment canceling the lease, and allowed plaintiffs the statutory sum of $100 and $300 for attorney fees, all as provided in G. S. 1949, 55-201 and 55-202.
The lease involved in this suit was called a “community” lease, but the special provisions of the lease need not be noted in the entirety. The pertinent parts of the lease and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- McKee v. EatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Konitz v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. HattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Cranston v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- In the Interest of J.A.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Mansfield Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. Budlaw Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Watson v. Gibson Capital, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.