National Labor Relations Board v. Injection Molding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, Circuit Judge.
The Respondent Company, which will be referred to hereafter as the Respondent 1 , employed somewhat less than fifty persons, mostly women, in its business in Kansas City, Missouri. It had a collective bargaining agreement with Local 710 of the CIO, which was made June 21, 1949, and which was by its terms to expire July 1, 1950. On February 15, 1950, CIO Local 710 was expelled from the CIO. On the same day the regional office of the United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers of America of the CIO (UAW-CIO) notified Respondent that a majority of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- National Labor Relations Board v. Central Dispensary & Emergency HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hollinger v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hunter Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954