Legal Opinion

Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1976No. 19 and 20PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

These appeals present the question whether jurisdiction in equity exists in suits by public employes against their employers and collective bargaining representatives to enjoin payroll deductions for union dues, and to recover the amount of dues already deducted. The Commonwealth Court held that it has equitable jurisdiction of such suits. For the reasons which follow, we have concluded that the instant action was initiated for the purpose of enjoining an arguably unfair labor practice and that therefore jurisdiction of the grievance is in the Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Cumberland Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Mazzie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Kapil v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University FacultiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth, Office of Administration v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API