Legal Opinion

Du-Co Ceramics Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the claimant, Lee A. Storoz, was properly awarded unemployment compensation benefits. In order to resolve that question this court must decide if the claimant voluntarily quit her employment or was terminated by her employer. If we find that claimant did voluntarily quit, we must determine if she did so for a necessitous and compelling reason. As we find that claimant did voluntarily quit and that she did so without a necessitous and compelling reason, we reverse the decision of the Commonwealth Court.

Claimant had been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Monaco v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Truitt v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Craighead-Jenkins v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. C. Slater v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API